Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Buzz off: Pa. honeybee colony getting new home

Tristan Saunders, a member of the PA Backyard Beekeepers Association in the Harrisburg area, studies an old piece of bee hive he pulled from the catalpa tree on Friday, March 1, 2013 that was home to a honey bee colony behind Leona Brensha's home in Duryea, Pa. (AP Photo/The Times Leader, Pete G. Wilcox) CITIZENS' VOICE OUT; SCRANTON TIMES OUT; STANDARD-SPEAKER OUT

Tristan Saunders, a member of the PA Backyard Beekeepers Association in the Harrisburg area, studies an old piece of bee hive he pulled from the catalpa tree on Friday, March 1, 2013 that was home to a honey bee colony behind Leona Brensha's home in Duryea, Pa. (AP Photo/The Times Leader, Pete G. Wilcox) CITIZENS' VOICE OUT; SCRANTON TIMES OUT; STANDARD-SPEAKER OUT

PPL Utility work crews lift a section of the catalpa tree on Friday, March 1, 2013 that is home to a colony of honey bees behind Leona Brensha's home in Duryea, Pa. (AP Photo/The Times Leader, Pete G. Wilcox) CITIZENS' VOICE OUT; SCRANTON TIMES OUT; STANDARD-SPEAKER OUT

Leona Brensha of Duryea, Pa. monitors the activity around her house on Friday, March 1, 2013 while a combination of workers from Asplundh Tree Expert Company and PPL Utility Company removes a honey bee colony nesting in catalpa tree behind Brensha's home, in Duryea, Pa. (AP Photo/The Times Leader, Pete G. Wilcox) CITIZENS' VOICE OUT; SCRANTON TIMES OUT; STANDARD-SPEAKER OUT

Luke Cline of the PA Backyard Beekeepers Association prepares a bee smoker used to calm bees while the section of catalpa tree containing the bee hive is placed into a truck ready to take the hive to its new home in the Harrisburg area on Friday, March 1, 2013, in Duryea, Pa. (AP Photo/The Times Leader, Pete G. Wilcox) CITIZENS' VOICE OUT; SCRANTON TIMES OUT; STANDARD-SPEAKER OUT

(AP) ? They say home is where the hive is. Or something like that.

A colony of troublesome honeybees will settle into new digs in northeastern Pennsylvania after being removed Friday from a back alley in Duryea, where the queen and thousands of her loyal subjects had taken up residence in an old tree several years ago.

They were such a nuisance that neighbors say they couldn't stand to be outside in the summertime. The bees got into garbage and recycling bins, disrupted barbecues and buzzed anyone who got too close.

"It was a big safety issue for us," said Joe Roscioli, 32, who is allergic to bees and whose house is only a few feet from the tree.

Years ago, an annoyed human might've eliminated the problem with a can of insecticide.

But with a mysterious affliction called colony collapse disorder decimating hives around the nation, Duryea's streets supervisor got a bee in his bonnet to save the colony and its 10,000 to 20,000 occupants. So on Friday, PPL Electric Utilities, a tree-trimming crew and several bee experts converged on the alley for a rescue operation.

With a small crowd looking on, licensed apiarist Bill Fisher and other experts drilled several holes in the tree, then inserted probes to establish the lower and upper limits of the hive.

"It's a lot like a colonoscopy for bees," Fisher joked.

Once the 60-foot northern catalpa tree was cut down to size, a crane lifted a 15-foot section of trunk onto a trailer destined for the Hershey area, where Fisher has a small farm. When it gets warmer, Fisher will try to extract the queen, slice out the comb, and transfer the colony to a bee box. Its ultimate destination, if all goes well, is a community garden in Drums, about 30 miles southwest of Duryea.

Such rescues are becoming more common. The state Department of Agriculture said it's seen an increase in calls from exterminators, residents and business owners who want to avoid destroying inconvenient hives and are seeking help.

"Colony collapse disorder has really increased awareness of the importance of honeybees," said Karen Roccasecca, Pennsylvania's state apiarist.

Gino Marriggi, the Duryea streets supervisor who launched Friday's rescue mission, said he couldn't be happier with the outcome.

"The neighbors are happy the bees are going to be gone, and I'm happy nobody's going to destroy them," he said. "It's a win-win."

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/b2f0ca3a594644ee9e50a8ec4ce2d6de/Article_2013-03-01-US-Honeybee-Rescue/id-f753b3b5528e4e3b93bd579d4d5cb973

Perez Hilton Michelle Obama Oscars Wissam Al Mana anne hathaway seth macfarlane oscar winners Castel Gandolfo

Missing Soviet war veteran now living as healer in Afghanistan

MOSCOW (Reuters) - A Soviet war veteran reported missing in action during fighting in Afghanistan 33 years ago has been found living as a local healer in the province of Heart, news agency Ria reported.

The soldier, who was rescued by Afghans after being wounded in the first months after the Soviet Union's invasion in 1979, was tracked down by a Moscow-based group of war veterans.

A native of the former Soviet Central Asian state of Uzbekistan, he now goes by the name of Sheikh Abdullah and has adopted the local dress and profession of the healer who nursed him back to health.

The deputy head of the Afghan war veterans' committee said Abdullah, whose given name is Bakhretdin Khakimov, mostly had forgotten the Russian language and never tried to contact his relatives after suffering severe head trauma in the fighting.

Alexander Lavrentyev, who met with Abdullah in Herat last month, said the veteran, who was 20 when he went missing, still bore the scars of his injury. His face is creased by a nervous tic and his hand and shoulder shake.

"He was just happy he survived," Lavrentyev was quoted by Ria as saying at a presser in Moscow on Monday.

The committee says it has found 29 of 264 soldiers still listed as missing from the bloody decade-long conflict. It said seven of those it contacted chose to stay in Afghanistan.

Some 15,000 Soviet troops were killed in the fighting that followed the Soviet Union's incursion to support a communist vassal government in Kabul against Islamist mujahideen fighters armed by the United States.

(Writing By Alissa de Carbonnel; Editing by Michael Roddy)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/missing-soviet-war-veteran-lives-healer-afghanistan-195720105.html

ben and jerrys free cone day tornado in dallas texas the island president the maldives harper lee mega millions numbers the fray

Monday, March 4, 2013

How to keep Facebook from annoying your friends

Facebook

5 hours ago

LH

NBC News

Facebook is using you, whether you know it or not. Sometimes it's obvious: you like a page, you click share, Facebook benefits. Other times, you have no clue until a friend asks you about a photo they saw that you liked. The unfortunate side effect to all of this is that it can actually make you an unbearable annoyance to your friends, and you probably don't even know it. Here's how it works, and how to stop it.

When we talk about the ways that Facebook uses your personal information, we're usually talking about why you should care about your privacy, or how Facebook tracks your activity. In this case, we're discussing how your Facebook habits are used ? with or without your knowledge ? to bother your friends with ads that they associate with you. It's a very different beast, but it can be stopped. Here's what you need to know.

EdgeRank: The math Facebook uses to pimp out your likes

You've probably seen an increase in posts in your news feed that say "[Your Friend] likes [Random Group]'s photo," with the full photo and text of the group's post right there, as though you liked the group yourself.

LH1

Courtesy of Lifehacker

On your phone or tablet, you've likely seen "Sponsored Posts" that say "[Another Friend] likes [Random Company]" with an invitation to like that page as well. It's annoying to be sure, but you also likely know that your friend didn't choose to advertise the page to you ? it's Facebook, using our habits to get likes and shares.

The logic that Facebook uses to decide what lands in your friends' feeds is called "EdgeRank," and it's purposefully obscure ? after all, if everyone understood it clearly (and lots of people claim to, but don't), advertisers wouldn't have to pay to promote posts, and users would be able to easily filter their feeds and block ads they don't want to see.

EdgeRank serves two purposes: For people who operate Facebook pages and manage brands, it's the algorithm that decides whether your post gets out to as many of your fans as possible. For users, it's the likelihood you'll see something in your feed liked or shared by someone else. It's also the math that governs why your news feed refuses to stay in real chronological order, even after you set it to "most recent."

We're not talking about your own status updates, photos or anything you post to Facebook yourself ? just the way you interact with other pages, groups, and people on Facebook. It's one thing if your news feed is full of baby pictures from your old high school friends ? it's another thing when every post you like from a group you follow ends up in all of your friends' news feeds without you knowing or being able to control who sees it.

Facebook uses you to help pages and brands find friends and go viral

The problem: When you see a post in your news feed from a group you've never heard of, like a heartwarming photo or a campaign for a cause, you might assume it's because your friend chose to share it with their followers by clicking the "share" button. That's not the case: odds are they thought it was good, clicked Like, and moved on.

A quick way to check is to visit their profile directly: if you don't see the post there, then Facebook decided that you might like to see it too, not your friend.

This is annoying, but it's especially problematic when you click like on something that may not be work-safe, assuming that "like" is not "share," so "who'll see it, right?"

H2

Courtesy of Lifehacker

For example, one of my friends is a model: she's attractive, and her photo shoots are often artsy, but it's nothing you'd want your boss asking you about because they peeked over your shoulder at work. By "liking" her posts about her photo shoots, I run the risk of unintentionally sharing her photos with my Facebook friends, and having their bosses scold them for looking at scantily clad model pics. See the problem?

Unfortunately there's no way out of this: Facebook doesn't let you set the privacy level of something you've liked. If the original poster shared publicly, your like is public as well. Remember that if you're a fan of any Facebook groups or pages that like to keep their posts in-group or close to pocket, or it may land in a friend's news feed.

This is EdgeRank in action: it's not sinister, it's just Facebook deciding that your friends may have similar interests and may like what you like.

The downside is that it populates your news feed with photos and updates from pages you may have no interest in, and does the same to your friends. We've shown you how to clean up your own feed, but how do you avoid cluttering up everyone else's feed?

The solution: First, think before you click the Like button. There's no way to determine which likes will be posted to which friends, so before you like that photo on one of your favorite pages, assume that it could be broadcast to all of your friends. Here are some other tips:

  • Hide those pages you like from your profile and set their posting rights to "only me." In our tests, doing this hid the things we liked from those groups from other people's feeds ? but we can't be 100 percent sure it'll work for everyone.
  • Check your activity log. This is the only way to know which of your likes are public and which aren't. (Go to your profile, then click "Activity Log.") You'll see a history of every status update, photo and shared item you've liked, along with an icon that'll tell you whether it's public or shared only with friends. Facebook usually doesn't let you change the visibility of those entries, but you can "unlike" something if you don't want it in someone else's feed with your name plastered over it.
  • Use Social Fixer to tame your own feed. You can use Social Fixer to trim down those types of reliked posts in your own feed, removing the temptation to like them yourself. Still, this doesn't stop Facebook from resharing groups you actually do like with your friends that don't.

Facebook uses your likes to sponsor brands, cluttering up your friends' feeds

The problem: You've seen the ads before: Friend A, B, and C Like [Brand], with a Like button next to it. They're right there in the middle of your news feed ? sometimes there are two or three of them together in a big "sponsored" box.

Facebook

Courtesy of Lifehacker

It's annoying, especially when the brand in question isn't even remotely interesting to you. Save your friends the hassle, and audit the brands and companies you like on Facebook.

The solution: Unlike pages and brands that you don't need an active relationship with, and don't like new ones unless you need to. Save your friends the irritation of seeing "So-and-So Likes A Company You Couldn't Care Less About!" every time they log in to Facebook and just remove brands you don't feel like providing free advertising for.

Don't get us wrong, lots of companies offer great customer service, discounts, and other incentives to like them on Facebook (we'd be lying if we said we didn't want you to like us on Facebook too,) but let's be honest. You probably liked a bunch of companies on Facebook because you shop there and wanted to see what their Facebook page was all about, or because they were running a contest that required you Like them ? not because they offer you any tangible benefit today. Alternatively:

  • Follow the same companies on Twitter instead. Twitter doesn't come with the same commitment that Facebook does, or the same access to your friends. You could also use Twitter lists to stay on top of their deals and coupons without having to like or follow them at all.
  • Set up a second Facebook account for "liking" purposes. A second account, one that you only use for things like promotions and discounts, is invaluable ? stuff it full of as much or as little information as you choose to provide, and then use it instead of your main account. You can even use it as a way to see what's Facebook is sharing from your primary account without you knowing (although the specifics vary from friend to friend.) Note: Facebook's policy is one person-one account, so you'd likely be violating their TOS by doing this. Just something to keep in mind.
  • Adjust your Facebook ad settings. One reader noted that you can also make sure to limit Facebook's ability to use your name and likeness in ads (which they currently don't, but say they may in the future), and how they use your likes and pages to generate ads for others to see. There's even a settings page governing it, even though it's quite buried. Set both options to "No One."

Facebook isn't planning to stop anytime soon

Annoying your friends ? by which we mean making sure that Facebook ads your friends see have your name above them (and vice versa) aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

Facebook's new Graph Search gives you a great way to find people who share interests with you, but it also gives advertisers a great way to cross-reference people's likes and interests so they can better target who should see their brand or product, and which of their friends they should use to say "See? Your friend already likes us, why don't you?"

Image from the always funny Actual Facebook Graph Searches.

Courtesy of Lifehacker

Image from the always funny Actual Facebook Graph Searches.

Now, Graph Search is only limited to a small number of people right now and it respects your privacy settings. If you're smart about keeping your privacy settings where they should be, you don't have anything to worry about from Graph Search. Similarly, it's not certain that Graph Search is even open to advertisers right now, so there's no reason to get out the torches and the pitchforks.

Another example of the same philosophy was Facebook's Social Reader. Graph Search is in the future, but Social Reader is a great example of a Facebook feature that went belly up because people didn't care too much for their activity being shared automatically and without their explicit permission each time it was used.

News sites using Social Reader, like The Washington Post andThe Guardian (the latter of which has already killed their social reader app) saw tumbling numbers last year as readers ditched them en masse. Whether they left because they didn't care for every story they read being automatically shared with their friends (assuming they didn't change post visibility to "only me,") or because they just didn't like what those apps had to offer is still a matter of debate.

The bottom line: Just know what you're getting into

The truth is that Facebook is a free service to users, and it needs to make money somehow, and that money will be made using your data. The question is whether Facebook uses it or they give it to someone else to use, and how that information is used.

The moral of the story here is to be careful with the things you like, because it's not just things you share that end up in your friends' news feeds. Since you can't even go to your profile to see what's been shared on your behalf, it's impossible to tell until someone pings you to ask why you've been liking so many posts from one particular Facebook group lately, or why the only thing you seem to share these days are someone else's photos.

Of course, stay on top of your privacy settings, the post visibility of apps you use (remember: "Only Me" is your friend,) watch what you click "Share" on. Oh, and of course: Every time Facebook makes an arcane change with nebulous results, make sure to update them accordingly.

Morefrom Lifehacker:

Source: http://www.today.com/tech/facebook-uses-you-annoy-your-friends-heres-how-stop-it-1C8645123

lil wayne Mockingbird Lane peyton manning sf giants gold rush gold rush windows 8

Venus sparkles in new views from Saturn

NASA / JPL-Caltech / SSI

The planet Venus sparkles as a bright point of light, seen through the rings of Saturn, in this image from NASA's Cassini orbiter. Venus is the speck just above and to the right of the image's center. The picture was captured on Nov. 10, 2012.

By Alan Boyle, Science Editor, NBC News

NASA's Cassini spacecraft has been sending us eye-filling pictures of the giant planet Saturn for almost nine years, but every so often, the camera also sees the small fry of the solar system?? such as Venus, which shines in the two latest offerings from the Cassini imaging team.

One of the photos, captured last November, shows Venus as seen through Saturn's gossamer rings, from a distance of 884 million miles (1.42 billion kilometers, or 9.51 AU). The other picture highlights Venus as a "morning star," hanging just beyond Saturn's edge and next to the giant planet's G ring. Venus was 849 million miles (1.37 billion kilometers, or 9.13 AU) away when that picture was taken in January, according to the imaging team.?

From such a distance, Venus looks like nothing more than a bright speck. Which isn't surprising, considering that Earth takes on pretty much the same appearance from Saturn, even though it's slightly bigger. The mind-boggling perspectives involved in space vistas led the late astronomer Carl Sagan to call our home planet a "pale blue dot," and I guess that makes Venus a pale yellow dot.


Venus looks lovely from millions of miles away, but it's not a place you'd want to visit, Carolyn Porco, the leader of the imaging team at the Colorado-based Space Science Institute, said in an email:

"Along with Mercury, Earth, and Mars, Venus is one of the rocky 'terrestrial' planets in the solar system that orbit relatively close to the sun," she wrote. "It has an atmosphere of carbon dioxide that reaches nearly 900 degrees Fahrenheit (500 degrees Celsius), a surface pressure 100 times that of Earth's, and is covered in thick, white sulfuric acid clouds, making it very bright. Despite a thoroughly hellish environment that would melt lead, Venus is considered a twin of our planet because of their similar sizes, masses, rocky compositions and close orbits.

"Think about Venus the next time you find yourself reveling in the thriving flora, balmy breezes, and temperate climate of a lovely day on Earth, and remember: You could be somewhere else!"

NASA / JPL-Caltech / SSI

Dawn on Saturn is greeted across the vastness of interplanetary space by the morning star, Venus, in this image from Cassini. Venus appears just off the edge of the planet, in the upper part of the image, directly above the white streak of Saturn's G ring. Lower down, Saturn's E ring makes an appearance. A bright spot near the E ring is a distant star. This picture was captured on Jan. 4, at a distance of about 371,000 miles (597,000 kilometers) from Saturn.

The Cassini spacecraft is sending back unprecedented imagery of Saturn, its rings and its moons. Click "Launch" to see some of the greatest hits from the Cassini mission.

More about Saturn and Venus:


Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's?Facebook page, following?@b0yle on Twitter?and adding the?Cosmic Log page?to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out?"The Case for Pluto,"?my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Source: http://photoblog.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/04/17182725-venus-sparkles-in-views-from-saturn?lite

pro bowl 2012 rick santorum daughter gainesville 2012 royal rumble the grey machine gun kelly saul alinsky

Enlightened, Season 2

Every week, Jeffrey Bloomer had an IM conversation with a different fan of?Enlightened. This week, he dabs his eyes about the season two (and possibly series) finale with June Thomas, a Slate culture critic.

Jeff: Well, June, we got a birth and a CEO near-death in that final half-hour, and plenty more in between. But first the big question: Is Amy the fool, the goat, the witch?or is she enlightened?

June: Look, if caring about something other than money is dopey, she's a fucking moron. And shockingly?because I rarely felt this in the episodes leading to this one?I do think she is enlightened. It felt to me like the confrontation with Szidon was cathartic. When she walked out of the meeting and managed that glorious "He seemed upset" to the security guard accompanying her, it did seem like a great weight had been lifted from her shoulders.

Jeff: Yes, that line was hilarious, and it was gratifying to see Amy hold her own upstairs, even if she had to be sheepishly dragged up there by the HR toads. (Why did she even bother to try to steal her hard drive?) And it wasn't just in that sequence, either?when Jeff invited her over afterward, she declined. It wasn't looking good for Amy last week, but in the end it turns out she really has seen the light.

More about that sequence in the office: The final moment with Szidon babbling obscenities into the elevator clearly mirrored Amy?s meltdown in the pilot. Is that a cute visual gift to patient viewers, or something more?

June: Well, if Mike White hadn't been campaigning for the show to be renewed, I would've been convinced that he intended this as a series finale. And I would've applauded his amazing ability to draw so many strands together over the course of two seasons. As well as the effective parallel between elevator-door rageathons that you pointed out, her final voice-over contained at least five lines from her post-rehab voice-over in the pilot. It was as if she asked questions in the pilot and then answered them in this episode. Her conclusion?"You can change. And you can be an agent of change??which we heard after seeing Amy and Levi apparently repair their relationship, and while we saw several of the supporting characters acknowledge the ways their lives had been transformed, felt like a really satisfying and uplifting note to end on. Did it seem that way to you?

Jeff: Absolutely.?Enlightened?has often moved forward haltingly, as characters seemed to make strides only to regress, and it was so nice to see it arrive at what felt like a rare moment of closure. When Amy saw the big front page of L.A. Times in those final moments and didn't bother to pick it up, that spoke a tremendous amount about how far she?d come. That said, after watching this episode, I was left with the conflicting sense that I was both satisfied and that I desperately wanted to know what happens next. I'm a little hooked on this thing.

June: So much movement! May I share a pet theory about Enlightened? There's so much driving; Amy always seems to be getting in and out of that dreadful car of hers. For a show that squeezes a lot into 30 minutes, I've always been struck by how many of those minutes are spent watching people sitting in their cars, usually alone. Sure, it's a Southern California show, so that makes sense. But I think it's also making a point about the path to enlightenment. It's not always as direct as a five-lane L.A. highway. In fact, I've noticed that breakthroughs often happen when Amy gets out of her car.

In Season 1, she and Levi went rafting, and she had a moment of clarity. Her mom wouldn't let Amy use her car, so she rode to work on the bus, and she had an epiphany. This season, Tyler drove her to her game-changing meeting with Jeff, and then when Levi returned, they took that heartbreaking walk to the old ball field. Those were all essential steps, but in this episode, she seemed to find closure?or at least a sense of oneness?with Levi. And when she got to his house after that astonishing scene at Abaddonn, she told him, "I was driving, and I have nowhere to go." She has arrived. At enlightenment? Maybe!

Jeff: That's clever! I hadn't made the connection between those scenes, but it does seem like geographical spaces are important: that long drive between L.A. and Riverside, the Abaddonn labyrinth. And given how dense this show is with metaphor, physical distance would seem to be an apt reflection of Amy's personal travels.

June: It's interesting that you call Abaddonn a labyrinth. It feels like a beehive to me?the bridges they take from the office towers to the parking lot feel like the spokes of a honeycomb cell. (And poor Eileen had to work under the gaze of a corporate film that showed bees at work.)

Jeff: Ah, yes, a beehive?I once tried to sketch Abaddonn?s grounds and came up with an incoherent maze of lines, but your reading feels right. As for Amy?s enlightenment, you could cast her return to Levi at the end as an old-Amy mistake?was he kidding when he offered her a beer??but she seems to have come in peace. Her larger question of "Who am I?" seems to remain open, though. I'm still not sure she knows.

June: Yes, Amy still has a lot more exploring to do. And like you I want to be present for her travels. I'm very conflicted about her return to Levi. In some ways the whole show has felt like a very smart meditation on middle age, specifically midlife mediocrity. Amy and Levi are both old enough to feel that avenues are closing to them?I don't really believe his assurance that they could still have a baby. At the same time, their lives are far from over. There's still hope (another word that came up a lot this episode). Amy can never stop wondering if Levi is The One. On one level, she knows she has to make a decision, really leave him for good or go back to him. But I think one of the realizations she had at the end was that there's still time to keep pondering all these questions.

Jeff: That?s true?that wasn't a real reconciliation, exactly, just a gesture that there was something unfinished there. (I too doubt a kid is a wise or plausible choice for them.) As for the future, as Amy tellingly puts it when she talks to Jeff for the final time: "We'll see."

In last week's chat, we said we'd call this finale a success if we saw Helen smile. And much to my slightly crazed glee at the end, she did! She saw the Times headline, and she was finally proud of Amy?and maybe even understood her?

June: Yes! This is one of the most blub-inducing shows on television, and Helen's grin of pride in the final montage was the oddest tearjerker of them all. At the beginning of the episode, when Amy told her mother that she had set a newspaper expos? of Abaddonn in motion, I was surprised by how sympathetic I was to Helen's response: "Why is that your business?" Amy was effectively homeless, $20,000 in debt, driving a shit car?why was she stirring up trouble? When Helen saw the headline, she seemed to know the answer to her earlier question. And so did we!

Jeff: We don't need to blow the whistle on Helen (or you, June) after all. And if she can understand Amy, anyone can?maybe even Amy herself. Until next year?

June: I hope so. There is only one life, and I want this TV show in it.

Source: http://feeds.slate.com/click.phdo?i=654bd65d9ddd3f3b0b095cb719b999ff

Irish Daily Star Black Mesa matt ryan matt ryan att wireless Mother Jones cars

Sunday, March 3, 2013

AP: NY fracking held as Cuomo, RFK Jr. talk health

These 2013 file photos show New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, left, in Albany, N.Y. and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Dallas, Texas. People familiar with Cuomo's thinking on fracking tell The Associated Press he was on the brink of approving the much-debated gas drilling method in February 2013 but held off after discussions with environmentalist and former brother-in-law, Kennedy. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez)

These 2013 file photos show New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, left, in Albany, N.Y. and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Dallas, Texas. People familiar with Cuomo's thinking on fracking tell The Associated Press he was on the brink of approving the much-debated gas drilling method in February 2013 but held off after discussions with environmentalist and former brother-in-law, Kennedy. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez)

(AP) ? New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo came as close as he ever has to approving fracking last month, laying out a limited drilling plan for as many as 40 gas wells before changing course to await the findings of a new study after discussions with environmentalist and former brother-in-law Robert F. Kennedy Jr., several people familiar with his thinking told The Associated Press.

The turning point, which could delay a decision for up to a year or longer, came in a series of phone calls with Kennedy. The two discussed a new health study on the hydraulic fracturing drilling method that could be thorough enough to trump all others in a debate that has split New York for five years.

"I think the issue suddenly got simple for him," Kennedy told the AP, then went on to paraphrase Cuomo in their discussions: "'If it's causing health problems, I really don't want it in New York state. And if it's not causing health problems, we should figure out a way we can do it.'"

Kennedy and two other people close to Cuomo, who spoke to the AP only on condition of anonymity because Cuomo is carefully guarding his discussions on the issue, confirmed the outlines of the plan the governor was considering to allow 10 to 40 test wells in economically depressed southern New York towns that want drilling and the jobs it promises. The plan would allow the wells to operate under intense monitoring by the state to see if fracking should continue or expand.

They all said it was the closest Cuomo has come in his two years in office to making a decision on whether to green-light drilling.

The state has had a moratorium on the process since 2008 while other states in the gas-rich Marcellus Shale formation, such as Pennsylvania, have seen local economies boom as drilling rigs have sprouted up.

Cuomo continues to refuse to talk about his internal process and wouldn't comment for this story. He has been repeating the phrase he's used for two years, that "science, not politics" will rule.

Kennedy, brother of Cuomo's ex-wife, Kerry, described a governor who is intensely involved in the emotion-charged issue, which Cuomo privately likened to taking on the National Rifle Association over gun control laws. Kennedy said Cuomo reached out personally to many others as well in his evaluation.

Kennedy believes Cuomo held off in large part because of the prospect of a new $1 million study by the Geisinger Health System of Pennsylvania, billed by property owners seeking safe fracking and environmentalists as a "large-scale, scientifically rigorous assessment" of drilling in Pennsylvania.

The study will look at detailed health histories of hundreds of thousands of patients who live near wells and other facilities that are producing natural gas from the same Marcellus Shale formation that New York would tap.

Unlike most studies funded by advocates or opponents of hydrofracking, this study would be funded by the Sunbury, Pa.-based Degenstein Foundation, which is not seen as having an ideological bent.

"I think it will be pivotal," Kennedy said. Preliminary results are expected within the year, but there is no specific timetable and final results could be years off. Kennedy is opposed to fracking unless it can be proven to be safe for the environment and public. He said he's unsure what the Geisinger report will conclude.

The Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York, a trade group, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on Saturday.

Shortly after the conversations with Kennedy in early February, Cuomo's health commissioner, Dr. Nirav Shah, mentioned the Geisinger study among three health reviews still pending and which could enter into Cuomo's decision. Shah, a nationally respected public health figure, was an associate investigator at the Geisinger Center for Health Research before going to work for Cuomo.

Cuomo, a popular Democrat who supporters say may run for president in 2016, is getting criticism from both sides over his delayed decision and calls for more studies. Landowners and industry say they're missing out on an economic boom while environmentalists say the administration should have ordered a full health study and has been too opaque about the regulatory process.

Some pundits have questioned whether Cuomo was "becoming Hamlet on the Shale," echoing a reference to criticism of his father, former Gov. Mario Cuomo, who spent politically damaging months as "Hamlet on the Hudson" publicly debating whether to run for president. It's a characterization Kennedy rejects.

Many federal and state regulators say hydraulic fracturing, which injects a mix of water and chemicals thousands of feet underground to crack open shale and release natural gas, is safe when done properly and thousands of sites have few complaints of pollution. But environmental groups and some doctors say regulations still aren't stringent enough and the practice can pollute ground water. The Marcellus Shale lies under parts of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia.

"What's interesting is Andrew is trying to figure this out," Kennedy said. "It's interesting to see this ... that usually doesn't happen. (Most governors) take a poll, or they take industry money and just do it ... but I think this is the harder route."

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2013-03-02-US-Gas-Drilling-Cuomo/id-4dea601d4fad47b986175e0a0ed76b3f

dominos dominos Perez Hilton school closings Michelle Obama Oscars Wissam Al Mana seth macfarlane

??????? ?? 16-17?? - ????? ???????????? ?????????? ... - Ferra.ru

? ??? ????? ????????
??????? ??????, ????????? ?????? ??????????? ?? 4???-? ????????, ????? ??????????, ?????- ? ??????? ?? ?????? i3 ivy bridge, ? ?????? ???????????????? ????? ???? ??????? ??????. ??? ???? ????? ??????? ??????. ?????????? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ? ??????? 1160-1200- ?????? ??????? ??? ??????????? ???????? ? fullhd. ???? ??????? 550?? ?????? ??????????...
????????????, ???? ??? ????????:
Изображение

????????? ?????????????? Simba ya: ???????, 18:40

Source: http://forums.ferra.ru/index.php?showtopic=54752

small business saturday best cyber monday deals best cyber monday deals macaulay culkin Larry Hagman macys apple